Infectious Agents and Autophagy: Sometimes You Win, Sometimes You Lose
نویسنده
چکیده
منابع مشابه
نگاهی دیگر به بیتی از مثنوی
Some texts, especially mystical and literary, are so intricate and labyrinthine that can be interpreted differently. These various interpretations sometimes result from the interior aspect of the texts, based on semantical understanding, and sometimes arise from their exterior aspect, based on different ways of reading the texts. Accordingly, while in another article along with other interprete...
متن کاملHeads I win, tails you lose!
It's coming again, the new collection that this site has. To complete your curiosity, we offer the favorite heads i win tails you lose book as the choice today. This is a book that will show you even new to old thing. Forget it; it will be right for you. Well, when you are really dying of heads i win tails you lose, just pick it. You know, this book is always making the fans to be dizzy if not ...
متن کاملA Logic for Strategy Updates
In game theory, strategy for a player is defined as “a set of rules that describe exactly how (...) [a] player should choose, depending on how the [other] players have chosen at earlier moves” [14]. Notice that this definition of strategies is static, and presumably constructed before the game is actually played. For example, consider chess. According to Zermelo’s well-known theorem, chess is d...
متن کامل“Heads I Lose, Tails You Win”, Or, How Richard Wiseman Nullifies Positive Results, and What to Do about It: A Response to Wiseman’s (2010) Critique of Parapsychology
Psychologist Richard Wiseman is a well-known British critic of parapsychology, frequently appearing in the British media to “debunk” psychic research. In his recent (January/February 2010) Skeptical Inquirer article “‘Heads I Win, Tails You Lose’: How Parapsychologists Nullify Null Results”, Wiseman argues that parapsychologists have tended to view positive results as supporting the existence o...
متن کاملHow Research on Behavioral Decision Making Challenges Normative Standards of Rationality
For more than 30 years, decision-making research has documented that people often violate various principles of rationality, some of which are so fundamental that theorists of rationality rarely bother to state them. We take these characteristics of decision making as a given but argue that it is problematic to conclude that they typically represent departures from rationality. The very psychol...
متن کامل